<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prototype 1.5.1 is baaaaad for Safari 1 and 2 users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.codefront.net/2007/06/21/prototype-151-is-baaaaad-for-safari-1-and-2-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.codefront.net/2007/06/21/prototype-151-is-baaaaad-for-safari-1-and-2-users/</link>
	<description>Rails, Firefox, Anime, Mac</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gdog</title>
		<link>http://blog.codefront.net/2007/06/21/prototype-151-is-baaaaad-for-safari-1-and-2-users/comment-page-1/#comment-226609</link>
		<dc:creator>gdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 01:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codefront.net/2007/06/21/prototype-151-is-baaaaad-for-safari-1-and-2-users/#comment-226609</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more...sucks that I&#039;d have to upgrade my OS just to use Safari - Not to mention, it&#039;s hard as hell to find an older Safari to download and they seem to have the crashing problem anyway - so I&#039;m not at all happy about that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more&#8230;sucks that I&#8217;d have to upgrade my OS just to use Safari &#8211; Not to mention, it&#8217;s hard as hell to find an older Safari to download and they seem to have the crashing problem anyway &#8211; so I&#8217;m not at all happy about that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://blog.codefront.net/2007/06/21/prototype-151-is-baaaaad-for-safari-1-and-2-users/comment-page-1/#comment-207640</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 02:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codefront.net/2007/06/21/prototype-151-is-baaaaad-for-safari-1-and-2-users/#comment-207640</guid>
		<description>What really yanked my chain was when we discovered it, I immediately thought.. Safari 1 and 2 eh? Who wouldn&#039;t upgrade to 3? -- Answer - errr.. all the poor chaps who are stuck with the older versions because you have to update your entire OS (and likely machine) to get the new one!  Bad, bad Apple. I like you guys, but that&#039;s dirty pool. Maybe I&#039;m wrong here, someone correct me please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What really yanked my chain was when we discovered it, I immediately thought.. Safari 1 and 2 eh? Who wouldn&#8217;t upgrade to 3? &#8212; Answer &#8211; errr.. all the poor chaps who are stuck with the older versions because you have to update your entire OS (and likely machine) to get the new one!  Bad, bad Apple. I like you guys, but that&#8217;s dirty pool. Maybe I&#8217;m wrong here, someone correct me please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

