<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cone of gayness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.codefront.net/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.codefront.net/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/</link>
	<description>Rails, Firefox, Anime, Mac</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:14:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mase</title>
		<link>http://blog.codefront.net/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/comment-page-1/#comment-34968</link>
		<dc:creator>Mase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 13:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codefront.net/archives/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/#comment-34968</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://123.com&quot; title=&quot;123&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;234&lt;/a&gt;
kinda funny =)))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://123.com" title="123" rel="nofollow">234</a><br />
kinda funny =)))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gilray4</title>
		<link>http://blog.codefront.net/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/comment-page-1/#comment-7009</link>
		<dc:creator>gilray4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 05:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codefront.net/archives/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/#comment-7009</guid>
		<description>I was going to post a link to a .htaccess  redirect file that a friend turned me on to. Yet it is basically the same as what you have (with few extra bells and whistles). I am glad to see it being discussed, as I in turn was getting debilitating spam at a couple of blogs, such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sightdeezygn.com/blog/&quot;&gt; &#039;E carpe&#039; diem &lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;kaleoaloha.com/blog/&quot;&gt; kaleo&#039;s bloggery &lt;/a&gt;. &quot;Spam Karma&quot;, simple url blocks etc, did very little yet the .htaccess file seemed to take care of the bulk of it.
On the issue of homosexuallity:
Just a fun factoid, in pre contact Hawai&#039;i there was a word for a man that did the chores of the women. This was importantin a society that had such a strong role, and class system. If a mother and father had nothing but male offspring it made things imballanced enough that one (or more) sons were taught to hang with and do &quot;womens work&quot;. The word for this was not used derogatorily, but rather there was a certain positive status  attached to the display of humbleness and civic duty. 
My point:
It is not the world, that has issues with homosexuallity per se&#039;, however americans definitely have very uptight &quot;freak-o-matic&quot; reactions to most of the basic aspects of human sexuallity (gender preferences, nudity etc) and even basic body functions. 
But then the polls show that a majority percentage of americans belive in or support, the curtailing of their own freedom of speech and press. Freedom of religeon and worse yet, openly &quot;spit in the eye&quot; of the Geneva convention, in open condonment of torture applied to people who are &quot;guilty till proven innocent&quot;.
In short I would&#039;nt pay much heed too guff about a gay joke from a society that appluads evening news about &quot;Guantanamo  bay&quot;
(oops did I really just say that)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to post a link to a .htaccess  redirect file that a friend turned me on to. Yet it is basically the same as what you have (with few extra bells and whistles). I am glad to see it being discussed, as I in turn was getting debilitating spam at a couple of blogs, such as <a href="http://www.sightdeezygn.com/blog/"> &#8216;E carpe&#8217; diem </a> and <a href="kaleoaloha.com/blog/"> kaleo&#8217;s bloggery </a>. &#8220;Spam Karma&#8221;, simple url blocks etc, did very little yet the .htaccess file seemed to take care of the bulk of it.<br />
On the issue of homosexuallity:<br />
Just a fun factoid, in pre contact Hawai&#8217;i there was a word for a man that did the chores of the women. This was importantin a society that had such a strong role, and class system. If a mother and father had nothing but male offspring it made things imballanced enough that one (or more) sons were taught to hang with and do &#8220;womens work&#8221;. The word for this was not used derogatorily, but rather there was a certain positive status  attached to the display of humbleness and civic duty.<br />
My point:<br />
It is not the world, that has issues with homosexuallity per se&#8217;, however americans definitely have very uptight &#8220;freak-o-matic&#8221; reactions to most of the basic aspects of human sexuallity (gender preferences, nudity etc) and even basic body functions.<br />
But then the polls show that a majority percentage of americans belive in or support, the curtailing of their own freedom of speech and press. Freedom of religeon and worse yet, openly &#8220;spit in the eye&#8221; of the Geneva convention, in open condonment of torture applied to people who are &#8220;guilty till proven innocent&#8221;.<br />
In short I would&#8217;nt pay much heed too guff about a gay joke from a society that appluads evening news about &#8220;Guantanamo  bay&#8221;<br />
(oops did I really just say that)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheah Chu Yeow</title>
		<link>http://blog.codefront.net/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/comment-page-1/#comment-5941</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheah Chu Yeow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codefront.net/archives/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/#comment-5941</guid>
		<description>What was even funnier was when someone thought that they had to login to &lt;em&gt;my&lt;/em&gt; router to view my site (and offloaded a full drip of sarcasm in the process), when it was actually &lt;em&gt;his&lt;/em&gt; own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was even funnier was when someone thought that they had to login to <em>my</em> router to view my site (and offloaded a full drip of sarcasm in the process), when it was actually <em>his</em> own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://blog.codefront.net/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/comment-page-1/#comment-5939</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codefront.net/archives/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/#comment-5939</guid>
		<description>I thought it was quite funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was quite funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheah Chu Yeow</title>
		<link>http://blog.codefront.net/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/comment-page-1/#comment-5904</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheah Chu Yeow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codefront.net/archives/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/#comment-5904</guid>
		<description>This is what I have in my .htaccess to redirect several known IPs that have been referrer spamming me:

RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^67.19.178.84 [OR]
RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^67.19.185.242 [OR]
RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^69.50.164.155 [OR]
RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^195.175.37.26 [OR]
RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^195.175.37.24
RewriteRule ^.* http://%{REMOTE_ADDR}/ [L]

Same thing, this time matching referrer URL:

RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} sex [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} porn [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} viagra [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} coolios\.net [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} hostack\.com [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} pornwizzard\.com
RewriteRule ^.* http://%{REMOTE_ADDR}/ [L]

My list is much longer than that of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I have in my .htaccess to redirect several known IPs that have been referrer spamming me:</p>
<p>RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^67.19.178.84 [OR]<br />
RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^67.19.185.242 [OR]<br />
RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^69.50.164.155 [OR]<br />
RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^195.175.37.26 [OR]<br />
RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^195.175.37.24<br />
RewriteRule ^.* <a href="http://%" rel="nofollow">http://%</a>{REMOTE_ADDR}/ [L]</p>
<p>Same thing, this time matching referrer URL:</p>
<p>RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} sex [OR]<br />
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} porn [OR]<br />
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} viagra [OR]<br />
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} coolios\.net [OR]<br />
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} hostack\.com [OR]<br />
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} pornwizzard\.com<br />
RewriteRule ^.* <a href="http://%" rel="nofollow">http://%</a>{REMOTE_ADDR}/ [L]</p>
<p>My list is much longer than that of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://blog.codefront.net/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/comment-page-1/#comment-5903</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codefront.net/archives/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/#comment-5903</guid>
		<description>What technique are you using to block out referrer spam? I&#039;ve taken care of comment spam on my site, but I need something for refererrers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What technique are you using to block out referrer spam? I&#8217;ve taken care of comment spam on my site, but I need something for refererrers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: closet optimist</title>
		<link>http://blog.codefront.net/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/comment-page-1/#comment-5891</link>
		<dc:creator>closet optimist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codefront.net/archives/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/#comment-5891</guid>
		<description>&quot;What? no girlfren? Are you gay?&quot;

I think people whom get offended do not understand that sometimes boys use &#039;gay&#039; jokes against a person&#039;s lack of a girlfriend then at him being &#039;gay&#039;. 

Sort of indirect reverse psychology, to prod and encourage him to get one.

The &#039;exaggerattion&#039; of him being &#039;gay&#039; is probably just a well meaning way of covering up the deeper sadder truth.

And...... misunderstanding all this is even sadder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What? no girlfren? Are you gay?&#8221;</p>
<p>I think people whom get offended do not understand that sometimes boys use &#8216;gay&#8217; jokes against a person&#8217;s lack of a girlfriend then at him being &#8216;gay&#8217;. </p>
<p>Sort of indirect reverse psychology, to prod and encourage him to get one.</p>
<p>The &#8216;exaggerattion&#8217; of him being &#8216;gay&#8217; is probably just a well meaning way of covering up the deeper sadder truth.</p>
<p>And&#8230;&#8230; misunderstanding all this is even sadder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watching Rats Abandon Ship</title>
		<link>http://blog.codefront.net/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/comment-page-1/#comment-5884</link>
		<dc:creator>Watching Rats Abandon Ship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2004 20:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codefront.net/archives/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/#comment-5884</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Should I be offended or amused?&lt;/strong&gt;
Some weird intersection between D&amp;D and Gay Culture? :-) http://blog.codefront.net/archives/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Should I be offended or amused?</strong><br />
Some weird intersection between D&#038;D and Gay Culture? :-) <a href="http://blog.codefront.net/archives/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/.." rel="nofollow">http://blog.codefront.net/archives/2004/12/13/cone-of-gayness/..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

